# Community Discussion: Invalid Keypairs of 4 Grantees

**URL:** <https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/community-discussion-invalid-keypairs-of-4-grantees/5636>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [March 23, 2022, 7:30am UTC](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/community-discussion-invalid-keypairs-of-4-grantees/5636 "2022-03-23T07:30:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pete](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forums.minaprotocol.com/pete/32/1225_2.png) [@Pete](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/u/Pete)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2022, 11:09am UTC](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/community-discussion-invalid-keypairs-of-4-grantees/5636/4 "2022-03-23T11:09:43Z")

</div>

Thanks for bringing this up again @b_mckenna. I am not sure if you are aware but there is actually a thread already devoted to this topic (started in Dec 2021) [What about Honest Validators that haven't met minimum Reward Requirements? - #4 by Aki](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/what-about-honest-validators-that-havent-met-minimum-reward-requirements/5150/4)

Having discussed this with several community members I think there is a consensus (among them) that as we look forward to increased decentralisation of Mina Protocol there are still many decisions that (for now) will have to be made by Mina Foundation.

I understand the need for transparency and discussing this with the community is a good way to gauge opinion, but until there is some kind of community DAO I think the Community will (on the whole) respect any decision made if it reflects the core values we have come to expect from MF.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/community-discussion-invalid-keypairs-of-4-grantees/5636)._