# Quick fix propose for tokenomics article

**URL:** <https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/quick-fix-propose-for-tokenomics-article/5601>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous\
**Created:** [March 12, 2022, 9:51am UTC](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/quick-fix-propose-for-tokenomics-article/5601 "2022-03-12T09:51:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![talha](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forums.minaprotocol.com/talha/32/1283_2.png) [@talha](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/u/talha)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2022, 9:51am UTC](https://forums.minaprotocol.com/t/quick-fix-propose-for-tokenomics-article/5601/1 "2022-03-12T09:51:24Z")

</div>

[https://minaprotocol.com/tr/blog/mina-token-distribution-and-supply](https://minaprotocol.com/tr/blog/mina-token-distribution-and-supply) I saw the phrases “Snapps” in this article have been changed to “zkApps”. So nice. I would like to propose another quick fix.

The charts in tokenomics article were calculated on a 1b supply because at first it was thought that total supply of Mina would be about 1b.

 ![Screenshot_3](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/uploads/minaprotocol/original/2X/8/802c76b1c245e6fbf78750faa1e2f39d4ea325c3.jpeg)

However, Mina’s total supply at the time of its debut was 824.48m. I think it would be good if these charts were redesigned with 825m total supply.